To jest od japończyków dla japończyków
My nie jesteśmy targetem .
Szukaj
To jest od japończyków dla japończyków
My nie jesteśmy targetem .
jak sobie przypomnicie produkt pentaxa (chyba 110)
to jest to cudo
http://www.cameraquest.com/pentx110.htm
dość ryzykowny ruch
Dla mnie kółeczko z numerami 1, 2, 3, 4 w miejscu w którym trzyma się aparat dyskwalifikuję go na starcie.
Amatorzy – martwią się o sprzet. Profesjonaliści – martwią się o pieniądze. Mistrzowie – martwią się o światło.
Jak powstają takie aparaty to z pewnością nieuchronnie nadchodzi koniec świata.
O co im chodzi z tym aparatem?
Mam nadzieje, że zapowiadanie nowości, w tym bezlusterkowe profi będą ciekawsze.
Cudowne podsumowanie tematu jak zwykle Thom Hogan www.bythom.com :
Pentax today joined the mirrorless (or ILC) market with what can only be regarded as an oddball entry: the Q is a very small interchangeable lens camera with a 1/2.3" sensor (same as many compact cameras). It also costs more than any compact camera at US$800, and that's with just a 47mm f/1.9 equivalent lens. Some of you may remember the old Auto 110 system, where Pentax (and Kodak) tried to invent a small, new film format. Why the folks at Pentax think it's worth repeating that mistake, I don't know. When 4/3 was originally announced, I accused Olympus of bringing a knife to a gun fight. Pentax has now officially brought a pea shooter slingshot. Or a paper weight.
The problem is that if you use the compact camera sensors, you're competing against...wait for it...compact cameras. Pentax gave the new Q (is the naming department on vacation or watching Bond movies?) five lenses, a "normal" f/1.9, a kit-zoomish f/2.8-4.5, a fisheye, and two lenses labeled Toy Lens that cost US$80 each (again, what's with that naming department?). Let's see, they're competing against some compact cameras with longer focal length ranges that are f/1.8-2.2. To what end is the "interchangeable lens" aspect helpful in that if you're already starting at a deficit?
Someone will surely bring up the "cute" or "retro" aspects (it looks a bit like a toy film-era camera), but as I've written before, if you go for fad-dominated design, you've completely lost the thread of camera making. Meanwhile, we've got startups like Lytro (next story) breaking entirely new ground. Who do you think is more likely to win that dance? At least the Pentax Q has a new Scene exposure mode we haven't seen before: Forest. Apparently Pentax designers can't see the trees for the forest.
dpreview called the Pentax Q "ever-so-slightly eccentric." No, it's not slightly anything. It's over-the-top bizarre. Bizarre enough that Pentax will sell a few to people who are more interested in being able to pull a mini-mini-SLR out of their pocket to impress others ("Name's Bond. Thom Bond"). Meanwhile, the rest of us will be taking better pictures with an Olympus XZ-1 for half the price
myślę co piszę
O w mordę, nie widziałem w życiu brzydszego aparatu...Zamieszczone przez fafniak
to obejrzyj wersje czarna
czarny "ładniejszy"
a jak byś miał w ręku komplet szkieł
Uprawnienia umieszczania postów
Odpowiedz z cytatem
Skontaktuj się z nami